“Hey Andy - Your recent posts on Googles new products lead me to do some research. check out this link … I’d love to get your take on it. Do you think Google is stepping into areas best left to Nielsen and the tracking agencies, or is this the next logical progression for them?!? Link Keep Cooking!” Andrew Clark
It’s only natural for Google to step into the areas that have previously been dominated by the likes of Nielsen and Comscore. Why? They have the data to do so. With such a majority in search technology it is easy for Google to mine these analytics, and with the economies of scale at Google - they can provide this information for free. This does directly undercut the business models of the companies mentioned in the link you provided. Will these companies go out of business? No.
While the business models conflict there are other issues at hand. Two of those are data integrity and different sampling methodoligies. The article you cited makes a great point…
Some experts wonder if Google’s Ad Planner service may be a conflict of interest. Will advertisers trust data from a source that sells them online advertising?
The point made is whether advertisers will trust analytics provided by the company they purchase advertising from. My bet is, yes, they will because it is so cheap to do so. The other issue is methodology which directly reflects sampling issues. Google gets 70% of search traffic meaning they don’t have analytical data on the other 30%. The traditional firms like Nielsen use statistical practices such as samples and controls. Regardless, as the article points out, “…the main argument being
that Web usage is too fragmented to be accurately represented by a limited
sample size. Reporting solid results about Internet usage becomes tricky when using a restricted number of participants.” This thinking affects both sides.
I think the industry that should be worried more than the analytical industry is the actual ad firms that do media planning. A couple years ago I built a media planner website for a local ad agency. This directly targets their business model, and with Google’s scalability and affordability, the AdPlanner could directly impact their business - especially when companies like mine exist to help these consumers use the inexpensive tools provided by Google.
Thanks to Andrew Clark for the question.
Do you have a question? Maybe you should Ask Andy!
Tags: AdPlanner, advertising, Ask Andy, Google, Media
2 Responses
Andrew B. Clark
July 1st, 2008 at 3:14 pm
1Andy -
Great assessment. With the availability of data Google controls, it does seem like a logical progression. Now, thinking from an agency\’s standpoint, do I fore go traditional sources for media measurement (AdMan, Nielsen, etc.) or do I cut costs and track with Google (sans 30% of the market).
Which one will benefit the client?
Great review!
Keep Cooking!
Andrew
Andy Brudtkuhl
July 1st, 2008 at 3:33 pm
2I wouldn’t forego traditional sources… yet. Google’s AdPlanner is very much in its infancy. I found little value in researching local SEM markets. I’d say at this point glean what you can from the free sources like Google and use it to fill in the cracks of the data from your traditional resources. I think your clients will benefit most from a combination of resources.
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply
Sponsors
Meta
Recent Readers
Sponsors
Categories
Reading
Links
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Most Commented
Get A New Browser is proudly powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease
GANB is written by Andy Brudtkuhl of 48Web