Comments on: Interesting Bug http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/ analyzing the business and technology of the web Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:34:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Andy Brudtkuhl http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-34902 Andy Brudtkuhl Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:36:41 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/#comment-34902 Mark - thanks for your insights... Tony - thanks I'll look into that and see if that can be a quick fix. Mike - It's a problem I should definitely fix in the engine so no problem on your side. I was just using your feed as an example (plus you got three links outta the deal :) As long as your feed is valid (which yours is) my indexer should definitely be able to process it. Plus, I wouldn't want everybody to have to change their feed settings for me :) I should have a fix up this weekend! Thanks again everyone Mark – thanks for your insights…

Tony – thanks I’ll look into that and see if that can be a quick fix.

Mike – It’s a problem I should definitely fix in the engine so no problem on your side. I was just using your feed as an example (plus you got three links outta the deal :) As long as your feed is valid (which yours is) my indexer should definitely be able to process it.

Plus, I wouldn’t want everybody to have to change their feed settings for me :)

I should have a fix up this weekend!

Thanks again everyone

]]> By: Mike Sansone http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-34901 Mike Sansone Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:32:34 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/#comment-34901 Should I overwrite the code to just show feeds feed?.feedburner.com Should I overwrite the code to just show feeds feed?.feedburner.com

]]> By: Tony http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-34900 Tony Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:27:52 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/#comment-34900 Well if you curl the feedburner url, you just get a 302 redirect to the second url (I figure it's there just for click-through stats). So why not just follow the redirects and use the end result as the content's url? Well if you curl the feedburner url, you just get a 302 redirect to the second url (I figure it’s there just for click-through stats). So why not just follow the redirects and use the end result as the content’s url?

]]> By: Mark Woodman http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-34897 Mark Woodman Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:33:10 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/#comment-34897 Andy, We encountered this kind of pain in the ROME project as well. Aggregation sucks without reliable uniqueness. In response to your post, I wrote up an article talking about the problem with the lack of a good GUID here: http://techbrew.net/articles/200709/rss-the-guid-problem/ Andy,

We encountered this kind of pain in the ROME project as well. Aggregation sucks without reliable uniqueness. In response to your post, I wrote up an article talking about the problem with the lack of a good GUID here:

http://techbrew.net/articles/200709/rss-the-guid-problem/

]]> By: Andy Brudtkuhl http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-34898 Andy Brudtkuhl Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:54:30 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/interesting-bug/#comment-34898 I would love to know how other RSS Developers hurdle this non standardized feature of what's supposed to be a standardized technology. A call for help to RSS Hackers! I would love to know how other RSS Developers hurdle this non standardized feature of what's supposed to be a standardized technology.

A call for help to RSS Hackers!

]]>