<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A la carte TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/a-la-carte-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/a-la-carte-tv/</link>
	<description>analyzing the business and technology of the web</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Lehmer</title>
		<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/a-la-carte-tv/#comment-34920</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Lehmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/09/a-la-carte-tv/#comment-34920</guid>
		<description>Glad to see this issue sprout some wings, Andy. It's been resurrected in my mind because of this whole Mediacom-Big Ten Network dustup. I just don't see how the current model used by Mediacom can survive much longer. That may be bad news for the (many) dozens of channels that most of us don't care about. Rather than riding the coattails of someone else, wouldn't it be better all the way around for a network (or show, for that matter) to rise or fall on its merits? Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see this issue sprout some wings, Andy. It&#8217;s been resurrected in my mind because of this whole Mediacom-Big Ten Network dustup. I just don&#8217;t see how the current model used by Mediacom can survive much longer. That may be bad news for the (many) dozens of channels that most of us don&#8217;t care about. Rather than riding the coattails of someone else, wouldn&#8217;t it be better all the way around for a network (or show, for that matter) to rise or fall on its merits? Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
