I love the idea of an a la carte tv subscription model. I don’t have cable because I don’t want to pay $60+ for 95 channels I won’t watch. So I find alternative methods of watching what I want (*cough* bit torrent *cough*). Apparently I’m not the only one interested in this as there is a class action lawsuit being filed by people who want it. They claim, “it’s a violation of antitrust law that they don’t offer a la carte channel selection.”
Mike makes two good points in his Techdirt coverage:
1) Studies have actually shown that in most cases a la carte offerings would end up costing more.
2) Either way, with the pace of change, it won’t be all that long before this doesn’t matter anyway — and the entire concept of the channel is dead. We’re reaching a time when people will simply subscribe to shows, and no one will worry about channels any more.
Great points Mike.
Want to keep up on the a la carte tv debate? Get the Fresh Feed.
Tags: a la carte tv, tv, lawsuit
One Response
Larry Lehmer
September 21st, 2007 at 11:44 am
1Glad to see this issue sprout some wings, Andy. It’s been resurrected in my mind because of this whole Mediacom-Big Ten Network dustup. I just don’t see how the current model used by Mediacom can survive much longer. That may be bad news for the (many) dozens of channels that most of us don’t care about. Rather than riding the coattails of someone else, wouldn’t it be better all the way around for a network (or show, for that matter) to rise or fall on its merits? Thanks for the post.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply