<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is OpenID the Single Sign-On Holy Grail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/04/is-open-id-the-single-sign-on-holy-grail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/04/is-open-id-the-single-sign-on-holy-grail/</link>
	<description>analyzing the business and technology of the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get A New Browser &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What does Sun think it&#8217;s doing?</title>
		<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/04/is-open-id-the-single-sign-on-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-34747</link>
		<dc:creator>Get A New Browser &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What does Sun think it&#8217;s doing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/04/is-open-id-the-single-sign-on-holy-grail/#comment-34747</guid>
		<description>[...] Will Sun&#8217;s support of OpenId make it a formidable candidate for single-sign-on and bring it to the enterprise? No. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will Sun&#8217;s support of OpenId make it a formidable candidate for single-sign-on and bring it to the enterprise? No. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craige</title>
		<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/04/is-open-id-the-single-sign-on-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-26961</link>
		<dc:creator>Craige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/04/is-open-id-the-single-sign-on-holy-grail/#comment-26961</guid>
		<description>Well, I think people should support it. As Mark said, the difference is that it is open. It is simply a protocol. It does not have a centralized user base. Users are free to move from provider to provider.

I know I&#039;ll personally be supporting it on a number of upcoming sites, and I think others should too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think people should support it. As Mark said, the difference is that it is open. It is simply a protocol. It does not have a centralized user base. Users are free to move from provider to provider.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;ll personally be supporting it on a number of upcoming sites, and I think others should too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Woodman</title>
		<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/04/is-open-id-the-single-sign-on-holy-grail/comment-page-1/#comment-26799</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Woodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getanewbrowser.com/2007/04/is-open-id-the-single-sign-on-holy-grail/#comment-26799</guid>
		<description>The main difference IMO is that OpenID is... open.  All the others were proprietary stovepipes.  I love that I can  set up identity and delegate to any OpenID Provider I choose, and switch providers if one of them proves undesirable. 

Holy Grail?  Maybe not, but at least everybody is invited to the party.  The MicroYahooGoogle solutions were too exclusive.

So yeah, support it.  JanRain&#039;s libraries make it easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main difference IMO is that OpenID is&#8230; open.  All the others were proprietary stovepipes.  I love that I can  set up identity and delegate to any OpenID Provider I choose, and switch providers if one of them proves undesirable. </p>
<p>Holy Grail?  Maybe not, but at least everybody is invited to the party.  The MicroYahooGoogle solutions were too exclusive.</p>
<p>So yeah, support it.  JanRain&#8217;s libraries make it easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

