October 2006

CNET TV

by Andy Brudtkuhl on October 26, 2006

If you are reading this there’s a really good chance you know who and what CNET is. They have been providing technology and internet news and reviews for years. They have been into podcasting for awhile, including one of my favorite podcasts. Recently they launched CNET TV which is essentially a very well produced video blog. It is your favorite tech news and reviews in video form.

But they fail on a few aspects that should not go unnoticed by other networks entering this type of media and video syndication. After watching a video including Steve Ballmer discussing the Zune I wanted to share it with a friend. Unfortunately – this is nearly impossible. The URL is masked so I couldn’t send the URL via IM like I do when I want to quickly share a YouTube video. There is no ‘Blog This’ option. There is no ‘Email This’ option. In order for my friend to view the video I have to say, “Go to CnetTV.com. Click on the tech news channel. Then scroll to page 5 of the shows and click Ballmer talks about the Zune.” That’s ridiculous. It’s anti-viral.

Every other feature requires registration. At least they syndicate via RSS.

{ 0 comments }

Why Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft are NOT Competing

by Andy Brudtkuhl on October 23, 2006

Yes, I know, they do compete in many many endeavors but each company has successfully carved out their own niche.

Google’s future is in media distribution and advertising. This is obvious through recent acquisitions (YouTube) and R&D spending (Dark Fiber Purchases). They are building the infrastructure for the next generation of media and content distribution. Why? Well they currently own the next generation advertising landscape and if they control the distribution of information they can wrap their advertising package around it.

In this way they can monetize the same content twice. For instance, CBS will pay Google to distribute Survivor via YouTube. That’s the first revenue stream. Next, Google will wrap that in classic AdSense ads as well as their burgeoning video advertising intentions. And that’s the second revenue stream. They have disintermediated a future market – which is genius.

Of course while writing this I read Yahoo is to acquire AdInterax, which provides technology for advertising in rich media distribution channels. Yahoo has also been maintaining their own advertising network. One may consider this a direct competition to Google’s behemoth advertising network. I disagree. Yahoo’s expenditures in the advertising arena are to support its own content creation giving them the ability to monetize on their main focus – content creation.

Content creation is Yahoo’s focus, whether it be content created by the community through social networks (delicious, flickr, facebook potentially) or content produced by Yahoo and its affiliates. The recent Current TV – Yahoo deal is a great example. Yahoo also has successful portals, Yahoo 360, Yahoo Answers, etc – all content based applications.

Okay so how about Microsoft? They seem to get their hands in about everything but what is their core business? Granted they have their cash cows such as MS Office and their Windows Server platform. But what are they banking on? Integration and content delivery.

Sure Microsoft has been trying to enter different segments of the web including social networking and video or the new Windows Live platform. Microsoft’s future is providing the platform for the distribution and dissemination of information. They seek to own the living room. Your Windows Mobile phone and your Zune complement your XBOX 360 and Vista Media Center. Your content is everywhere and access to information is easy.

Okay so I realize there are secondary competitions going on with these three companies – like they all maintain video sites. They all have advertising networks. They all have email and instant messaging tools. Google and Microsoft will soon be competing for productivity platforms (office suites). Etc, Etc, Etc…

All these services for which GYM competes are secondary markets for them to support their core businesses. And at their core they do not compete.

Let’s Review:

1. Yahoo! – Content Creation
2. Google – Content Distribution
3. Microsoft – Content Delivery

What do you think?

Tags: , , , , ,

{ 4 comments }

37S on Apple

by Andy Brudtkuhl on October 23, 2006

TJ found this earlier this morning and passed it along. I then found it on Google Video and decided to share.

37Signals on Apple

{ 0 comments }

Yay, Internet Explorer 7 Is Out!

by Andy Brudtkuhl on October 19, 2006

Well, not really yay – but it is out.

You can download it from Microsoft here.

Interestingly enough, Yahoo is providing a Yahoo! branded version of IE 7 available for download which is ‘Optimized For Yahoo!’. Features include Yahoo Mail enhancements as well as a Yahoo! search bar and homepages.

Jeremiah Owyang was at the IE7 launch party and should have some interviews with the IE7 team up shortly.

So download it and have fun! And once you are sick of it, get Firefox.

{ 4 comments }

Google Gadgets for Your Site

by Andy Brudtkuhl on October 19, 2006

Google announces ‘Gadgets for your Website‘ today. This is a cool idea but all the gadgets are, well, hideous. And most of them are fairly worthless. But, if you are a developer you can create your own gadgets. Will this catch on? I doubt it. They are ugly and provide little value. I wonder if Yahoo will release widgets for the web? Their ‘widgets’ are far cooler than Google’s ‘gadgets’.

Below are Technorati and Google Zeitgeist gadgets. The technorati tracker is actuall pretty cool because it allows your readers to track the conversation they are currently reading about. Although it doesn’t appear to be working that great. The gadget below is supposed to be pulling posts from Technorati tagged ‘ie7′ and it does not appear to be doing so.

Get your own gadgets.

{ 0 comments }