July 2006

It's not delicious if you can’t taste it

by Andy Brudtkuhl on July 25, 2006

A la George Constanza, I’m going to do this post opposite my normal scheme – starting with the point. To get beyond the stated Techcrunch target, meaning adoption of Web 2.0 technology and applications is steady with the level of readership of the popular blog, technology must be abstracted from the user’s perception.

They don’t need to know nor care about the technology. Does Microsoft claim in its advertising of Microsoft Office that it’s built in C++ using the latest Remote Procedure Call algorithms to create a unified architecture that runs on the latest Common Language Runtime (ps – I made that up)? No, they don’t. And since they defined the industry, I’d say they know what they are doing (sometimes).

In the industry we call it the ‘can my mom use it?’ test. Note: I am not being sexist or ageist but rational. The test includes several examples.

1. Is your marketing confusing to my mom?

My mom doesn’t care if you are next best web 2.0 company providing bleeding edge social networks features that allow you to podcast and blog. If you don’t know these buzzwords, that message gets lost in the tubes of the internet.

2. Is your brand based on the technology you use?

Your brand should never be based on the technology you are using because technology is confusing and will never last the life of your company. My mom doesn’t care if you are a podcasting directory – but she does care if you have relavent stuff for her to listen to.

3. How do you describe your product or service offerings?

If the following words are involved in describing your offerings, my mom doesn’t care: blog, wiki, podcast, web 2.0, social network, ajax, [insert buzzword here]. Don’t restrict your audience to people who know these words.

4. Once she actually figures out what the hell you are offering, can she even use it?

Walk her through tagging, bookmarking, bookmarklets, RSS, OPML, etc. You’ve already created a maze for her to walk through and she made it. Now she’s going to leave because she still doesn’t get it and even more — doesn’t know how to use it. There’s nothing worse than a user who doesn’t really grasp what she’s using and nonetheless cannot figure out where to start using it.

I am not saying to avoid these technologies / ideas by any means. I want people to embrace them and I am banking on the fact that they do. Spouting buzz words may get you attention in the blogosphere or from VC’s but my mom doesn’t care. And if you want to get over the Techcrunch hump you need a message and brand that my mom can understand.

If you still don’t get it think of real world examples you have experienced. How many times have you tried to teach a non-geek the following?

  1. using an RSS aggregator
  2. podcasting
  3. the benefits of online, social bookmarking
  4. why they need a blog
  5. what a wiki is

It doesn’t matter if it’s your mom, your non-geek friend, your boss or CEO. Once you spout acronyms, technology, or buzz words they stop hearing what you are saying – nod their head – and say okay. And they never try again.

Abstract the technology and you are far better off reaching a broader audience. Dave Winer recently posted, ‘Let’s ask what RSS is‘. In his sans technology definition he says it is “automated web surfing.” Excellent start.

technorati tags:, , , , , , ,

{ 0 comments }

My favorite sites (at least this week)

by Andy Brudtkuhl on July 25, 2006

PBS.Org / Frontline

To me PBS along with other Public Broadcasting companies like NPR have been leading the way in the adoption of new media syndication. They provide RSS feeds and podcasts for all their shows. Frontline, which is my favorite PBS show (and an excellent design) gives viewers the ability to watch the program online. Granted I this is not a site I visit a lot but it is very well put together.

NYTimes.com

Although still packed with content the latest design from the New York Times has a classic feel to it but also provides excellent navigation adn very readable content.

Netflix.com

Full of AJAXy goodness this site provides a wonderful interface that makes selecting, rating, and searching for movies very easy.

Newsvine.com

Although I visit this less frequently than I did when it was released Newsvine is one of my favorite designed sites. News sites and aggregators should analyze this design and take many things away from it such as the navigation, easy way to view tags, and simple things like layout, typography and whitespace.

VMWare.com

Recently visiting this site to download their latest free virtualization software I was shocked to see a very well designed corporate website. It looks like they have taken a page out of Macromedia’s old book but it is a very clean and simple design. And I have to say they made dropdown menus cool again.

Technorati.com

Just in time for this post Technorati updated their site for their 3 year anniversary and it is far better than the old site. And while writing this post I see TJ has disagreed with me. I have used the old one extensively and it was not easy to navigate as a registered user. I like the different sections of the new design for registered users because I go there to view the information relevant to me, which was more difficult before. Search, unfortunately, is still too slow for me.

9Rules.com

9Rules is also recently underwent a redesign making it one of my favorite designed sites out there. The new focus on communities was definitely needed for the growing site. The addition of notes is a nice feature. The colors, simplicity, and focus on content is a very nice touch. This site is designed exactly for its content. Good work.

technorati tags:, ,

{ 1 comment }

Technorati

by tjmapes on July 25, 2006

Technorati has gotten a face lift. At first glance of the homepage, I don’t really know if I like it at all. It deffinatley has a weaker quality to it than the old one. But when I did a search for getanewbrowser, it showed me a beautiful design with side sections like “mentions by day” which shows posts mentioning getanewbrowser in the past 30 days. I believe they had stuff like this before.

Take a gander and see what you think, old vs. new…

{ 0 comments }

How often do you read your feeds?

by Andy Brudtkuhl on July 19, 2006

Do you check your feeds as often as email?

How often do you check your RSS subscriptions?

I check mine once or twice daily and if I comment I do it right after reading. Sometimes a save a firefox session of blog posts that I want to read later if I see some I do not have time to read.

What about you? It is interesting to know how people use RSS and RSS tools in comparison to tools like it such as email.

{ 8 comments }

When software gets little

by Andy Brudtkuhl on July 14, 2006

What do you do when software gets little?

Anyone who has ever developed an application most likely knows what I am talking about, unless they are an uber-developer who creates the perfect application every time.

Software gets little at the end of a project – when all that’s left are the little things. To me, this is the worst part of the project. My mind works on the grand scheme of things, which is why I like being a software architect. In the end of a development project you are working on spec changes, bug fixing, visual tweaks, font changes, etc, etc, etc. These are all the little things.

What’s tough about this stage is two-fold: 1) there is less reward for accomplishing a little feat, and 2) it’s much harder to get and stay organized in the very dynamic environment when your application does get little.

This is true in any project if you are an event planner, a project manager, a construction worker, etc. You start with a goal and a plan. And every reached milestone along the way is a success. But every milestone still contains little things that you decide can wait until the end. Then once the end is reached, you have a bucket full of disorganized little things.

Sometimes you want to disregard the little things as what they are — little. You say, ‘That’s not a fundamental aspect of the project, let’s just forget about it’. But the value of the little things does not correlate to the impact they have in the project or the time it will take for you to finish. The little things create value that is unbeknownst to you until you implement them. They are the glue that holds your project together — what makes your project a success.

What do you do when your projects get little? How do you stay organized? Better yet, how do you abstain from having a bucket of little things at the end of a project?

technorati tags:, , ,

{ 4 comments }