<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designing for Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/</link>
	<description>analyzing the business and technology of the web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Broad</title>
		<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>James Broad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 12:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>This comes back to the form over function debate doesn't it?

In my opinion it is down to the nature of the site. If it is an ego driven design obsessed webmonkey adding content about something that the web has already been there and done, then the only thing to help its readership will be what else the site has to offer; design.

The perfect example of designing a site based around content has to be &lt;a href="http://www.alistapart.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;A List Apart&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comes back to the form over function debate doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>In my opinion it is down to the nature of the site. If it is an ego driven design obsessed webmonkey adding content about something that the web has already been there and done, then the only thing to help its readership will be what else the site has to offer; design.</p>
<p>The perfect example of designing a site based around content has to be <a href="http://www.alistapart.com" rel="nofollow">A List Apart</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abrudtkuhl</title>
		<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>abrudtkuhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>But what generates publicity?

Content and functionality both of which are enhanced by good design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what generates publicity?</p>
<p>Content and functionality both of which are enhanced by good design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuswanto</title>
		<link>http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuswanto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I agreed, but content is not enough to drag people to your site, you need publicity to drive your visitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreed, but content is not enough to drag people to your site, you need publicity to drive your visitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
