Comments on: Designing for Content http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/ analyzing the business and technology of the web Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:34:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: siteman11 http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-79753 siteman11 Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:36:23 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-79753 The conclusion is that committee driven marketing slows the process down. He says his page loads fast because he doesnt have a font declared because that would result in bloating his CSS. If that hurts performance than you should really look into a new ISP. So use a mobile media attribute in your stylesheet link. You dont have to make your normal website look like shit to adhere to different mediums. Six Apart has a nice review on the design of the site. And although the NYT redesign is not breathtaking or aesthetically stunning they designed for their content.This is a great post. Lots of great information. href=" http://www.pof.freesinglescrowd.com pressmania.com/store/AdManiacStore.aspx The conclusion is that committee driven marketing slows the process down. He says his page loads fast because he doesnt have a font declared because that would result in bloating his CSS. If that hurts performance than you should really look into a new ISP. So use a mobile media attribute in your stylesheet link. You dont have to make your normal website look like shit to adhere to different mediums. Six Apart has a nice review on the design of the site. And although the NYT redesign is not breathtaking or aesthetically stunning they designed for their content.This is a great post. Lots of great information. href=” http://www.pof.freesinglescrowd.com

pressmania.com/store/AdManiacStore.aspx

]]> By: James Broad http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-33 James Broad Sat, 08 Apr 2006 12:12:35 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-33 This comes back to the form over function debate doesn't it? In my opinion it is down to the nature of the site. If it is an ego driven design obsessed webmonkey adding content about something that the web has already been there and done, then the only thing to help its readership will be what else the site has to offer; design. The perfect example of designing a site based around content has to be <a href="http://www.alistapart.com" rel="nofollow">A List Apart</a>. This comes back to the form over function debate doesn’t it?

In my opinion it is down to the nature of the site. If it is an ego driven design obsessed webmonkey adding content about something that the web has already been there and done, then the only thing to help its readership will be what else the site has to offer; design.

The perfect example of designing a site based around content has to be A List Apart.

]]> By: abrudtkuhl http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-31 abrudtkuhl Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:33:50 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-31 But what generates publicity? Content and functionality both of which are enhanced by good design. But what generates publicity?

Content and functionality both of which are enhanced by good design.

]]> By: Kuswanto http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-29 Kuswanto Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:17:20 +0000 http://getanewbrowser.com/2006/04/designing-for-content/#comment-29 I agreed, but content is not enough to drag people to your site, you need publicity to drive your visitor. I agreed, but content is not enough to drag people to your site, you need publicity to drive your visitor.

]]>