March 2006

The State of Search – Dont Become Extinct

by Andy Brudtkuhl on March 27, 2006

We live in an information society. We want relevant information and we want it fast. Google saw this social trend coming and has revolutionized the way we search for and gather information. The search engine giant has done such a remarkable job that the word “Google” is often used as a verb.

But have businesses fully adapted with this Google revolution? You’d be surprised how many companies have neglected to jump on board, and to be honest, that’s about as stupid as inviting Dick Chaney to your next quail shoot. Google Adwords (pay-per-click advertising) has changed the landscape for which marketing/advertising is conducted. It’s easy: 1) People search for products and services on Google, 2) You set up an Adwords account and start showing up when people search for keywords related to your product or service, 3) You pay only when someone clicks your link. It’s beautiful because no advertising dollars are wasted on uninterested prospects.

The bottom line is companies that refuse to jump on board with Google Adwords will become extinct. They’ll slowly lose their customer base and die.

{ 0 comments }

Adding contributor

by Andy Brudtkuhl on March 27, 2006

We have decided to add a contributing writer in a space we do not regularly write about but we feel is a relevant area for our readers. TJ and I touch on marketing a bit as well as search marketing. We hope Brian can help fill that void as a contributing marketing and search marketing writer.

You can read his firs post, ‘The State of Search’ on getanewbrowser.com now.

Brian runs the search and email marketing startup NimbleAd.
Welcome aboard.

{ 0 comments }

new design!

by Andy Brudtkuhl on March 27, 2006

We have officially launched our new design!

If you are a feed-only person, please come check out the new design at getanewbrowser.com

We put a hefty amount of work into it. TJ did most of the design while I handled the architecture.

We have successfully migrated from Blogger to WordPress hosted on an Windows 2003 box with IIS6. You can read more of the technical details at brudtkuhl.com later today or tomorrow. I was also able to maintain all of our existing permalinks.

We are still working on a few quirks here and there. The first thing we are going to tackle is the formatting of comments. That will be taken care of tonight. There are also a few validation errors due to my hacking of the WordPress PHP. That will also be fixed this evening.
Please let us know what you think. Send us an email or leave a comment

Thanks

Andy & TJ

{ 3 comments }

The UnSurprising Truth About Good Design

by Andy Brudtkuhl on March 25, 2006

I just read an article I found through The Web Design Blog, which is a great web design resource. Mark Daoust recently wrote an article for SiteReference about how ugly websites are fine. In ‘The Surprising Truth About Ugly Websites‘, Mark provides several examples and ideas about how ugly websites are just as good as well-designed sites. Well Mark, I think it’s safe to say that Get A New Browser disagrees with this notion.

Here’s our two cents worth.

“The example of Plenty of Fish lead me to consider how an ugly website could be so successful. As I looked around, I suddenly realized that this was not the only successful ugly website. Ebay is unbelievably ugly, Craigslist has never won an award for innovative design, and IMDB has never even bothered to format their text out of the default Times New Roman. What is it about ugly websites that makes them so successful?”

Our View: Content sells websites. Sure, CraigsList is ugly, eBay is ugly, and Google is less than appealing. Your conclusion is that because these are some of the most successful websites that design does not matter. But would re-design hurt? No. Maybe they will be more successful if they enhanced their user experience. So, why not use design to enhance your content?

—-

“Yet the fact is, ugly websites do have the ability to present the perfect marketing message. What is that message?

You can trust us. We are a family run business and do not employ a marketing team. Our website is simple, but functional. Most importantly, our goal is to serve our customers, not necessarily learn HTML.”

“And this is one reason that ugly websites can sell. The lack of professionalism and a polished look leads one to believe that they are dealing with an individual. Websites cannot be trusted, but individuals can be trusted.”

Our View: When I see an ugly web site the second thing I think of after ‘I’m not going to waste my time here’ is ‘This can’t be legitimate’. I see an ugly site and I think that it’s generated spam or one of those ad sites you go to when you type in a wrong url.

A polished site creates an image of professionalism and integrity. As a customer you are telling me that you value my experience with my site by the work that you put into it. Would you buy a new car that the automaker decided not to paint? Would you buy a new house if the homebuilder decided to only build half the structure becuase the home would still stand?

“The general lesson here is simplicity. A beautiful website may draw a user in initially, but a simple website will keep your users coming back. If one of your users gets lost trying to navigate your website, check out of your web store, or finding simple contact information, then you unnecessarily are increasing the chances that this user will simply leave.”

Our View: Does beautiful design not directly contribute to simplicity? Good design creates good navigation. Good design organizes content. Good design eases and enhances the user’s experience. Organized content is what makes sites sticky.

—-

“The second question is a rule that should apply to every website: functionality is more important than the design of your website.”

Our view: Good design produces the best functionality. Want proof? Ask 37Signals.

The Surprising Truth About Ugly Websites – Mark Daoust

{ 1 comment }

Web 3.0 in production

by Andy Brudtkuhl on March 22, 2006

Move over Web 2.0, Web 3.0 is knocking on the door. It’s going to barge in and use you as its floormat to become the buzziest of terms.

Okay, the idea is cool and all and it’s a great extension of Web 2.0 architecture. But, please, please come up with something better than ‘Web 3.0′. We’re all clever people.

As I said the idea is merely an extension of Web 2.0 architecutre meaning that Web 3.0 takes over where Web 2.0 leaves off. So, why not Web 2.1? I don’t know. Apparently I do not have the power to create naming conventions. Regardless it adds layers such as API, Aggregation, and Delivery (which I think are all products of Web 2.0). Anyway, I put together a graph of my interpretations of the analysis.

To explain, Web 1.0 is all about retrieval. It is the base platform (HTTP protocol) that provides the distribution of content. Web 2.0 championed in the idea of a read / write situation where the community and the publishers are producing content. Web 2.0 created a two way interactive environment. In my mind this ‘Web 3.0′ model applies to companies currently in tact, a la Megite, Memeorandum, and Edgeio. It deals with the extension of the software as a service model into the software as a platform model.

As Jeffery Zeldman said in his excellent post, ‘Web 3.0‘, “As for me, I?m cutting out the middleman and jumping right to Web 3.0. Why wait?”. I’m in.

Phil Wainright is all over it.

Photostream

? Web 3.0 at Spark in Las Vegas | Software as services | ZDNet.com

tags: , , , ,

{ 3 comments }